Не работают сеты с underwear

T

test

Heir
Customer
1732394553961.webp
Не пашет ваша гадость.
для примера потестил
Code: 
    <set id="74" underwear="485" enchant6skills="9830-1" />
    <set id="75" underwear="486" enchant6skills="9830-1" />
    <set id="76" underwear="487" enchant6skills="9830-1" />
    <set id="77" underwear="488" enchant6skills="9830-1" />
    <set id="78" underwear="489" enchant6skills="9830-1" />
    <set id="79" underwear="616" enchant6skills="9829-1" />
    <set id="80" underwear="618" enchant6skills="9829-1" />
    <set id="81" underwear="620" enchant6skills="9829-1" />
    <set id="82" underwear="622" enchant6skills="9829-1" />
    <set id="83" underwear="624" enchant6skills="9829-1" />

аналогичный и у других
Code: 
<armor id="486" name="underwear">
    <!-- [tattoo_o__fire] -->
    <set name="crystal_count" value="733"/>
    <set name="crystal_type" value="B"/>
    <set name="crystallizable" value="true"/>
    <set name="icon" value="icon.tattoo_core_i00"/>
    <set name="price" value="952000"/>
    <set name="type" value="NONE"/>
    <set name="weight" value="750"/>
    <equip>
      <slot id="UNDERWEAR"/>
    </equip>
    <cond msgId="1507">
      <not>
        <player olympiad="true"/>
      </not>
    </cond>
    <for>
      <add stat="pDef" order="0x10" value="19"/>
      <enchant stat="pDef" order="0x0C" value="0"/>
    </for>
  </armor>
 
Why not use it directly on the item?
XML: 
<armor id="486" name="underwear">
    <!-- [tattoo_o__fire] -->
    <set name="crystal_count" value="733"/>
    <set name="crystal_type" value="B"/>
    <set name="crystallizable" value="true"/>
    <set name="icon" value="icon.tattoo_core_i00"/>
    <set name="price" value="952000"/>
    <set name="type" value="NONE"/>
    <set name="weight" value="750"/>
    <equip>
      <slot id="UNDERWEAR"/>
    </equip>
    <cond msgId="1507">
      <not>
        <player olympiad="true"/>
      </not>
    </cond>
    <enchant6_skill id="9830" level="1"/>
    <for>
      <add stat="pDef" order="0x10" value="19"/>
      <enchant stat="pDef" order="0x0C" value="0"/>
    </for>
  </armor>

I think underwear needs the other parts to be used in armorsets!
 
Coffee said:
Why not use it directly on the item?
XML: 
<armor id="486" name="underwear">
    <!-- [tattoo_o__fire] -->
    <set name="crystal_count" value="733"/>
    <set name="crystal_type" value="B"/>
    <set name="crystallizable" value="true"/>
    <set name="icon" value="icon.tattoo_core_i00"/>
    <set name="price" value="952000"/>
    <set name="type" value="NONE"/>
    <set name="weight" value="750"/>
    <equip>
      <slot id="UNDERWEAR"/>
    </equip>
    <cond msgId="1507">
      <not>
        <player olympiad="true"/>
      </not>
    </cond>
    <enchant6_skill id="9830" level="1"/>
    <for>
      <add stat="pDef" order="0x10" value="19"/>
      <enchant stat="pDef" order="0x0C" value="0"/>
    </for>
  </armor>

I think underwear needs the other parts to be used in armorsets!
Click to expand...
broken.

This is working good
Code: 
    <set id="68" chest="438" enchant6skills="9927-6" />
    <set id="69" chest="440" enchant6skills="9927-6" />
    <set id="70" chest="458" enchant6skills="9927-6" />
    <set id="71" chest="459" enchant6skills="9927-6" />
    <set id="72" chest="460" enchant6skills="9927-6" />
 
Ага.
"Поведение" у underwear конечно непонятное.
По идее говоря можно было и очень хотелось расширить возможности сетов, но...
Включение underwear допустим в драконик сет по задумке должно было давать чару 2 скила в итоге. Первый пассивный скил от самого драконика, а второй от комплекта драконик сета с определённым underwear
 
test said:
View attachment 4827
Your crap doesn't work.
I tested it for example
Click to expand...

or maybe the crap is yourself!
open eyes-start paying attention

ATTLIST set
id CDATA #REQUIRED
chest CDATA #REQUIRED
legs CDATA #IMPLIED
head CDATA #IMPLIED
gloves CDATA #IMPLIED
feet CDATA #IMPLIED
skills CDATA #IMPLIED
shield CDATA #IMPLIED
underwear CDATA #IMPLIED
shield_skills CDATA #IMPLIED
enchant1skills CDATA #IMPLIED
enchant2skills CDATA #IMPLIED
enchant3skills CDATA #IMPLIED
enchant4skills CDATA #IMPLIED
enchant5skills CDATA #IMPLIED
enchant6skills CDATA #IMPLIED
Click to expand...

-chest CDATA #REQUIRED
-underwear CDATA #IMPLIED
shield CDATA #IMPLIED
shield_skills CDATA #IMPLIED


which means you must set a chest armor part for the set effect to even start working

I tested it for example.
Click to expand...
(you tested by your own mind, not paying attention to what data is neccecary)
or you tested in a big hurry ultimately trying to make an "armorSET" made up of only 1 armor item...gj
Code: 
Code:
    <set id="74" underwear="485" enchant6skills="9830-1" />
    <set id="75" underwear="486" enchant6skills="9830-1" />
    <set id="76" underwear="487" enchant6skills="9830-1" />
    <set id="77" underwear="488" enchant6skills="9830-1" />
    <set id="78" underwear="489" enchant6skills="9830-1" />
    <set id="79" underwear="616" enchant6skills="9829-1" />
    <set id="80" underwear="618" enchant6skills="9829-1" />
    <set id="81" underwear="620" enchant6skills="9829-1" />
    <set id="82" underwear="622" enchant6skills="9829-1" />
    <set id="83" underwear="624" enchant6skills="9829-1" />

you only inserted an underwear part which can only be attached to a neccecary part like chest....try again
 
Hotaka said:
To him.
The "behavior" of underwear is certainly unclear.
In theory, it would have been possible and I would have really wanted to expand the capabilities of the sets, but...
The inclusion of underwear, for example, in a dragon set was supposed to give the character 2 skills as a result. The first passive skill from the dragon itself, and the second from the dragon set kit with a certain underwear
Click to expand...

the way it is made now: for the set and enchant skills to take effect, the tattoo becomes MANDATORY part of the set.
(just like if you UNequip any item of a set, then the set skill and enchant skill are broken/disable/dissapear.)

and you are asking of a different implementation of what was commented on the first place about this.
yet what you are talking about sounds better! extends functionality and set ability.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top